Does Economic Growth in China Equal Downfall for the US????

Most people believe that China has become more powerful and influential in recent years due to their economic status in the world.  China has been a significant resource to the United States for importing and exporting goods, and because of this China has become a powerhouse that can't be reckoned with.  Not only is China rising economically, which is due to the size of its population, but it is coming up the ranks in military as well.  If China continues on this path the United States will have to seriously think of ways to keep China at bay.

A good tactic in making sure China does not overtake the United States in the future is to work together rather than against each other.  Together, the United States and China make a very good team.  But, if the US continues to dictate and put more rules and regulations in place, it may contribute to the downfall of the United States in the near future.

China wants to grow financially and become just as powerful as the US and would prefer to have all the protection and support that the West has in order to survive.  I think that working together to achieve their goals would be a better approach for both China and the US to reach economic stability.

One Child Policy...Good and Bad

In this article is describes the negative and positive outcome of the one child policy in China.  The Chinese government believed that preventing families from having more than one child would create economic growth by decreasing its population size.  By placing this policy in effect the government was able to do just that, prevent population growth.

I agree and disagree with the one child policy.  I agree with this policy because your success rate will increase with the fact that you are solely responsible for the care and well-being of one child.  It can be quite difficult to make sure that the wants and needs are met for more than one child and yourself. Chinese workers are underpaid in the jobs they have, therefore they are not able to afford to live as good as individuals in other  countries, especially the United States.  I believe that Chinese parents would want their children to be much better off and successful. In order to make this a reachable goal
Chinese parents would be willing to work as laborers receiving crappy wages so that they can send their kids to good schools.  Imagine having more than one child....This would be an unrealistic and unreachable goal for many Chinese families.

I disagree with this policy because there are so many unpredicted things that could present itself, such as tragedy.  Chinese encountered a natural disaster recently that took the lives of many people including innocent children.  Since there is a one child policy in place, what happens to those families who have lost a child due to this unpredicted natural disaster?  These men and women may not be healthy or young enough to reproduce another life if given the okay to do so by the government.  There will be a void that can't be replaced and these families are just left to grieve the lost of a love one.

Therefore, the one child policy can be beneficial to both the families and the government in China.  The government will benefit by growing economically and preventing China from becoming overpopulated.  The families benefit from the fact they brought a life into the world that can change some or most of the hardships they had to face in the past.  These changes will come from better education which will provide these young people with better jobs to help take care of their families.

Urbanization....Does this work???

Urbanization is the migration of a large number of people from rural areas to urban areas. In the article about Chinese Urbanization, it discusses how China pushes to end poverty through urbanization.  Many people in China have migrated to urban areas to create a better lifestyle for theirselves and their families.  Chinese governments are investing in better infrastructures and residential housing which provides more job opportunities for those people such as farmers who migrate from rural areas to urban areas.

It is a great idea for those seeking better jobs, in order to become better off.  Some of the main attractions of urbanization include better infrastructures such as utilities, buildings, and roads.  Urbanization also allows people from rural areas the benefits of better health care and facilities, education, and entertainment for the whole family.

Some downfalls of urbanization can be overpopulation, pollution, increase in unemployment, and lack of resources.  I believe that some of these downfalls can be prevented by building up the rural areas as well.  This can be done by creating more jobs in agriculture, providing recreation/entertainment, and providing more health care and education benefits for individuals in these areas.  Creating better infrastructures will also be beneficial to people in rural areas.

Terrorism or Not???

In May 2014 an article written by Glenn Greenwald in The Guardian, touches on terrorism and its true meaning.  A British soldier was killed on the streets of London by two individuals that stabbed the soldier with a meat cleaver.  These two individuals who were said to be Muslims after being taken into custody, had been recorded speaking things from the Quran as they killed this innocent man.  The soldier was targeted because they were aware about his involvement in a nation at war against Muslims.  Civilians, politician, and social media automatically considered this incident an act of terrorism.

I agree that terrorism can be defined as a communicative act that disrupts the flow of every day life and is used to spread fear among the population of non state actors (International Studies, p.370).  Terrorists main goal is to provoke a military or political response as a form of recognition (International Studies, p.370).  The two muslim killers were retaliating on behalf of the Muslim community and definitely trying to send a message to the military and politicians.  The Muslims feel it is unfair that the US or UK can come to their territory and make war.  These wars have left several Muslims dead in their homes, cars, and work.  As soon as individuals like these two killers decide to attack it is immediately called an act of terrorism.

Unfortunately, during these wars innocent bystanders (civilians) are killed but I don't think the US does this intentionally or target a specific ethnic/religious group.  Terrorists, on the other hand, plan these attacks and then act out their thoughts.  Terrorists intentionally prey on civilians, military, and anyone who has political power.  Thus, making the above mentioned incident in London an act of terrorism.

Chile and Ecuador are both Spanish speaking states located on the Southern Cone in Latin America.  Both Chile and Ecuador are known to most as being poverty stricken states.  In the article about these two states it discusses the economy of both states and the reason why Chile is in a better financial state than Ecuador.

Ecuador receives a large percent of export earnings from oil and Chile receives a rather small percent of export earnings from copper, but yet Chile has made better progress in lowering the poverty level among their citizens.  Most of this can be contributed to the free-market global trading order.  Ecuador decided not to join the free market, thus causing their poverty rate to increase in number.  Since, Chile has decided to join the free market which would allow Chile access to other markets around the world, it has increased its GDP.

On the other hand, Ecuador should follow in the footsteps of the Chilean industry in order to decrease poverty among its population and to bring in more income to assist with construction, technological investments, and infrastructural enhancements.  By going that route it would make their resource of oil bring in more revenue.

Healthcare and disease prevention increases life expectancy

This article about disease and healthcare is what will determine the life expectancy in a country. It talks about all the diseases for example malaria, , mad cow disease, HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and much more.  These diseases derived from a particular country in the world, but can be spread by traveling from one country to the next.  For example malaria and the West Nile Virus originated in Africa, but is now widespread around the world.  Healthcare is the primary reason why many people in other countries outside of the United States suffer and don't live very long.  The article also talks about medicine trade from the United States to countries in need of them.

I agree that healthcare is a big issue in countries outside the United States.  The United States has excellent healthcare and ways to prevent diseases.  If other countries had the same resources it would prevent a lot of diseases from being transmitted to others as well as transporting diseases all over the world.  A lot of countries like Africa, Europe, and Asia lose lives daily due to their living conditions.  The life expectancy in these countries are much lower, but are presently making small progress. I believe that having a better healthcare system will increase the life expectancy in these troubled countries tremendously.   

Prison Life in Africa and Lack of Economic Growth

I have better insight as to what goes on in the prison system in South Africa after reading an article from "The Economist".  The jails that are ran by the state are in terrible condition.  The inmates have to endure overcrowding, poor conditions throughout the buildings, and rape.  Since most of the African population is HIV positive, rape will most likely lead to the spread of more infection.









On the other hand, the private prisons have much better conditions according to this article  The inmates do not have to deal with overcrowding and because the facility is fairly new, the buildings are in great condition.  Inmates are able to participate in workshops, sports, and gardening.  They have access to brand new equipment for sports.  The newer prison also has state of the art security for the inmates.  Unlike the state prisons, this new facility offers better food and inmates receive better medical care.  Millions of dollars have been spent to open these private prisons, but economic growth suffers outside of these prison doors.

This concept to make inmates more comfortable and spending millions of dollars in order to do so is baffling to me.  I do get the point that no one should have to deal with overcrowding while locked up, but to do things for one prison and not the other is unbelievable.  I believe that no matter what everyone should have equal rights to health care and nutrition, if nothing else.  Inmates in state prisons are suffering and so are the people who are not in the prison system.  There are families who suffer from malnutrition/famine, HIV, malaria, and infant mortality.  These individuals do not have the resources for food, clean water, or medical attention due to "hampered economic growth",(International Studies, p.259).  Due to war, colonialism, and imperialism, Africa has suffered tremendously from political and economic instability.